What makes a joke funny…? I don’t know but it gave me an excuse to look up funny jokes and write a nonsense speech on it. Ok so let’s start off with a good one.
A French fry walks into the bar and says to the bartender “Hey , could I get a beer please?”
The bartender looks at him shaking his head and said “No, we don’t serve food here”
Ok so let’s see here why does such a joke make us laugh. its really just stupid and if any of u laughed I feel sorry for you. But its wording might not make u laugh but u just think about the irony if you that he is food and in some bars they don’t serve food. On to the next ridiculous joke that you still probably wont find that funny.
What was the Pilgrims' favorite dance?
(The Plymouth Rock.)
Haha that was good one man I’m diein’ from laughter over here no seriously obviously the P.O.N. or Play On Words is what makes this joke so funny. Plymouth rock as you should all no is where the pilgrims first landed on the new world but rock is also a type of music and dance hence a ridiculous stupid p.on. Now on the every popular ever funny spelling jokes.
What letters did the man recite to his car when he ran out of gas?
( O-I-C-U-R-M-T )
Ok people ok people I know it is hard to stop laughing after that hilarious joke. The reason the joke is so funny (to those that find these ridiculous jokes funny) is because of when you read each letter individually you get a whole funny sentence. It is really just amazing what people think up. Next we have the Quotes.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
Said by unknown
We find this funny just because it was just funny come on. lets try another though
Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else.
Unknown
The funny thing about this is that its completely true it takes a real philosopher to think that up. But what makes these so funny is probably we all can experience them at some time at times we stand up for what we believe for and can be called insane, but would we have it any other way. And sometimes we just don’t feel unique there funny cause they relate to us.
Now I would like to do some dirty jokes. Just kidding Mrs. Byrely calm down. But I am going to do some great chuck Norris Jokes.
Boogyman checks his closet for Chuck Norris every night
It is said that looking into Chuck Norris' eyes will reveal your future. Unfortunately, everybody's future is always the same: death by a roundhouse-kick to the face.
In the medical community, death is referred to as "Chuck Norris Disease"
Chuck Norris frequently donates blood to the Red Cross. Just never his own.
Funny no hilaurious those are and those are just funny because it makes fun of a certain person these are probably the best jokes known to man they are also the most common if you think about it you say one every day Some call it bullying others just call it joking around but they are the best if u are just joking around.
And that’s it people hope you found it funny and I hope you didn’t learn anything.
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Thursday, January 7, 2010
that the matrix wasn't so far off
Thank you to Dan Brown who brought this to my attention. He's one of my favorite people to watch on YouTube. To view his channel click here > www.youtube.com/user/pogobat
His video the simulation hypothesis sparked my own feelings on the simulation hypothesis.
What is simulation hypothesis? Have you ever played the game the sims... Well that is, at the base, what the simulation hypothesis is, except very different. See people that understand the simulation hypothesis believe that one day we humans will have the technology to build a society like the sims that can live completely on its own. Im not going to deny that we may someday have this technology. Heck we may not even be that far off. We can simulate space we can simulate gaming, where gamers play in a virtual world. It is very possible someday we will have the technology, the computing power to do this. The type of computing power need to duplicate the physics that go on in our daily life would have to be amazing, but not completely unbelievable.
The matrix... the thing about this is... if we can build such a universe, whats to say that someone else hasn't already. Im say that maybe we are a similar simulated universe. That has to be a possibility however unlikely. If that is a possibility then it is also possible that the universe that created us could also be a simulation. Do you see where I'm going with this? It could go on forever. the simulation becomes the creator, creating another simulation then that simulation creates another sim, which in turn simulates another universe simulation. ON and ON.
So what does it mean? In reality ( haha I mean in simulation) nothing changes we still exist we still feel. Not even religion changes to me. Some people would say that this means that there is no god. But really something still had to create the first universe. So that doesn't change. What does change is that our life is dependent on the simulation that created us. When that world ends than so will we. We can't live without the virtual reality computer simulating our every physical property. This fact to me proves the hypothesis wrong. Our universe has been going on for a long time. I don't even know how long I can't remember. If we have proof that our universe is that old than how old is the other universe that created us. It hasn't been destroyed yet that seems unbelievable to me. Still pretty cool to think about.
Tell me what you think in a comment.
His video the simulation hypothesis sparked my own feelings on the simulation hypothesis.
What is simulation hypothesis? Have you ever played the game the sims... Well that is, at the base, what the simulation hypothesis is, except very different. See people that understand the simulation hypothesis believe that one day we humans will have the technology to build a society like the sims that can live completely on its own. Im not going to deny that we may someday have this technology. Heck we may not even be that far off. We can simulate space we can simulate gaming, where gamers play in a virtual world. It is very possible someday we will have the technology, the computing power to do this. The type of computing power need to duplicate the physics that go on in our daily life would have to be amazing, but not completely unbelievable.
The matrix... the thing about this is... if we can build such a universe, whats to say that someone else hasn't already. Im say that maybe we are a similar simulated universe. That has to be a possibility however unlikely. If that is a possibility then it is also possible that the universe that created us could also be a simulation. Do you see where I'm going with this? It could go on forever. the simulation becomes the creator, creating another simulation then that simulation creates another sim, which in turn simulates another universe simulation. ON and ON.
So what does it mean? In reality ( haha I mean in simulation) nothing changes we still exist we still feel. Not even religion changes to me. Some people would say that this means that there is no god. But really something still had to create the first universe. So that doesn't change. What does change is that our life is dependent on the simulation that created us. When that world ends than so will we. We can't live without the virtual reality computer simulating our every physical property. This fact to me proves the hypothesis wrong. Our universe has been going on for a long time. I don't even know how long I can't remember. If we have proof that our universe is that old than how old is the other universe that created us. It hasn't been destroyed yet that seems unbelievable to me. Still pretty cool to think about.
Tell me what you think in a comment.
Saturday, January 2, 2010
that the books got better but I guess they couldn't have gotten much worse
They really did (speaking of the 3 and 4th) and as a negative (but truthful) critic of the books i will be the first to say that but are they perfect no.
My problems actually come more from structure problems rather than from any plot problems like they have in the past.
the prologues have become such a hassle. They really are unnecessary it is a cool way to start a book but i really dont see much of a point for them in this series and though I have never liked them, it was really bad in the last. I think she was stretching for reasons to use this unique technique of hers.
Then the reading from Jacobs point of view. Dont like it. It was alright at first and nice to see the type of sacrifice he made from his own eyes but a good author probably could have found a better way to pass that time. Heck I would have went from Edwards point of view if I was going with any ones he could have seen it through Jacobs eyes and we would have seen his own pain. But I would have liked her to keep it the same as she has in all the other books. She hasn't went to other peoples perspectives thus far she shouldn't have done it now. It was the only time i felt the book actually dragged on.
To the actual plot. She actually kept the excitement going there were few boring spots in both. She had good plot twists I guess. They were good but the problem is I saw them all coming every damn one. One would think that that would make the stories boring. But in truth tho I knew what was going to happen a part of me wondered how they would take place. Even the baby called it! The problem doesn't lie in the fact that I could call every single plot turn it because that is one of the ways I would have written the book ( I also have another but its truthfully not as good) so I cant fault her for her predictabilitys instead I am going to complain about her foreshadowing. Foreshadowing is a great technique it builds curiosity and in that way suspense. But she over used it to the point that I knew what was going to happen because its the only way the book can lead.
It was better these two were good, completely different books from the first two. They had suspense, romance and some action. Actually both had climax's! thats a change. But just curiosity did everyone catch the 3rds climax. With so much suspense building up to the newborn fight that I expected the climax to come in a action form. But instead I think it was when Bella recognizes her need for Jacob. It was unneeded conflict. What would have been better is if she would have called him back then through her regret of hurting him. kissed him on the cheek and told him to fight and be careful like a friend. and he realizes that he loves her the same way as a friend. A protector. That would be characterization.
I wish Alice would have bitten Bella. That was what was supposed to happen. I knew it wasn't going to after the wedding. But she foreshadowed it and then sort of unforeshadowed it. That was the only loose end. And it doesnt bother me that bad but I think it would have added for some reason.
My problems actually come more from structure problems rather than from any plot problems like they have in the past.
the prologues have become such a hassle. They really are unnecessary it is a cool way to start a book but i really dont see much of a point for them in this series and though I have never liked them, it was really bad in the last. I think she was stretching for reasons to use this unique technique of hers.
Then the reading from Jacobs point of view. Dont like it. It was alright at first and nice to see the type of sacrifice he made from his own eyes but a good author probably could have found a better way to pass that time. Heck I would have went from Edwards point of view if I was going with any ones he could have seen it through Jacobs eyes and we would have seen his own pain. But I would have liked her to keep it the same as she has in all the other books. She hasn't went to other peoples perspectives thus far she shouldn't have done it now. It was the only time i felt the book actually dragged on.
To the actual plot. She actually kept the excitement going there were few boring spots in both. She had good plot twists I guess. They were good but the problem is I saw them all coming every damn one. One would think that that would make the stories boring. But in truth tho I knew what was going to happen a part of me wondered how they would take place. Even the baby called it! The problem doesn't lie in the fact that I could call every single plot turn it because that is one of the ways I would have written the book ( I also have another but its truthfully not as good) so I cant fault her for her predictabilitys instead I am going to complain about her foreshadowing. Foreshadowing is a great technique it builds curiosity and in that way suspense. But she over used it to the point that I knew what was going to happen because its the only way the book can lead.
It was better these two were good, completely different books from the first two. They had suspense, romance and some action. Actually both had climax's! thats a change. But just curiosity did everyone catch the 3rds climax. With so much suspense building up to the newborn fight that I expected the climax to come in a action form. But instead I think it was when Bella recognizes her need for Jacob. It was unneeded conflict. What would have been better is if she would have called him back then through her regret of hurting him. kissed him on the cheek and told him to fight and be careful like a friend. and he realizes that he loves her the same way as a friend. A protector. That would be characterization.
I wish Alice would have bitten Bella. That was what was supposed to happen. I knew it wasn't going to after the wedding. But she foreshadowed it and then sort of unforeshadowed it. That was the only loose end. And it doesnt bother me that bad but I think it would have added for some reason.
Friday, January 1, 2010
that technology is the best thing ever!!!!
I have wasted my whole existence rejecting the need for new technology. Denying it with "i dont need that" or "thats just unnecessary." Im not blind to the advancements though I know how to work most things fairly well, and I new the newest toys like the touch screen computers and the new smart phones such as the iphone and the droid. I just never thought these things were needed in everyday life.
But just yesterday I was awakened. I got a new phone (a rogue) and I made my mom get me Internet capabilities because how dumb is having a phone that can get Internet access and not using it? And would you believe it I havent found a place that I cant get on facebook, twitter, youtube, and google! I have now decided that i cant live without it! I have fallen in love! Im worried for my battery because it seems to die quickly... but how can I blame it I spend so much time on it that it hardly gets time to be off. Even right now im contemplating whether I can save this and pick up where I left off on my new phone. I shall never be out of the loop or bored again!!!!!
In a comment below tell me what I should name my new phone.
But just yesterday I was awakened. I got a new phone (a rogue) and I made my mom get me Internet capabilities because how dumb is having a phone that can get Internet access and not using it? And would you believe it I havent found a place that I cant get on facebook, twitter, youtube, and google! I have now decided that i cant live without it! I have fallen in love! Im worried for my battery because it seems to die quickly... but how can I blame it I spend so much time on it that it hardly gets time to be off. Even right now im contemplating whether I can save this and pick up where I left off on my new phone. I shall never be out of the loop or bored again!!!!!
In a comment below tell me what I should name my new phone.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
